Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. Bennett

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Second Judicial District, Silver Bow County. Action to recover for cutting and hauling logs. The cause was tried before Pemberton, J. Plaintiff had judgment below.

1Opinion of the CourtDe Witt, J.

This action is one by plaintiff against the defendants, seeking to recover for cutting and hauling logs. A question has arisen as to whether the action was upon a special contract or upon quantum meruit. Entertaining the view that we take of the case, a discussion of that matter does not seem to be required.

The plaintiff alleges that he cut and hauled for the defendants 469,000 feet of logs at the price of $4.75 per thousand, amounting in all to $2,227.75; that of this amount the defendants have paid him $1,341.61, leaving a balance due of $886.14. The defense set up in the answer is that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kennon v. GilmerMontana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Wykoff v. LoeberMontana Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hill v. McKayMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Lee v. HaydenMontana Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API