Legal Opinion

Eagle Marine Industries, Inc. v. Union Pacific Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2008No. 102462PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Freeman, Fitzgerald, Kilbride, Garman, and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

Plaintiffs, Eagle Marine Industries, Inc., River City Landscape Supply, Inc., and ConAgra Foods, Inc., doing business as Peavy Company, filed a complaint for injunctive relief against defendant, Union Pacific Railroad Company. Plaintiffs sought to enjoin and restrain defendant from obstructing a railroad grade crossing located on Monsanto Avenue west of Route 3 in Sauget, Illinois, for more than 10 minutes under section 18c— 7402(1) (b) of the Illinois Vehicle…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Village of Mundelein v. Wisconsin Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Eagle Marine Industries, Inc. v. Union Pacific RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Driesen v. Iowa, Chicago & Eastern Rr Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2011
  4. State v. CSX Transp., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. CSX Transp., Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API