Michael M. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1DissentMosk, J.
I dissent.
I cannot subscribe to the implied premise of the majority that the female of the human species is weak, inferior, and in need of paternalistic protection from the state. That concept is an anachronism in a society in which females have achieved remarkable progress toward equality. The tutelary syndrome of Victorian days has yielded to a new era in which women are contributing their talents in every field of endeavor—as prime ministers, governors, legislators, judges, corporate executives, lawyers, scientists, medical doctors, police officers, and professional athletes.
In this modern…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Weinberger v. WiesenfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sail'er Inn, Inc. v. KirbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.