In Re Abrams and Brennan
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a motion to set aside and modify the award of arbitrators. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying the motion of appellant to set aside and modify the award of certain arbitrators in certain matters of dispute submitted to them. In this case objection was made that the award was void, and that the court had no jurisdiction because it was not made and filed in time. It is clear that arbitration, being a creature of the statute, by which jurisdiction is taken from the courts of the matters to be arbitrated and vested in designated persons regardless of their calling or learning in the law, must find support in and be governed by the limitations and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bent v. Erie Telegraph & Telephone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- DeLong v. StahlSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- James v. Southern Lumber Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Fairchild v. DotenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fagnani v. Integrity Finance CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware · 1960
- Horse Creek Conservation District v. Lincoln Land Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- General Metals Corp. v. Precision Lodge 1600California Court of Appeal · 1960
- In Re Joshua Hendy Machine WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Willis Finance & Construction Co v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.