Legal Opinion

Springfield Gas Co. v. Herman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 1933No. 317PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, PJ.

We have road the record in this case with care and are cognizant of the respective theories of the patties concerning the cause of the explosion which wrecked plaintiff’s house. These theories were distinctly different and both had strong support by expert testimony of witnesses. It is unfortunate but true that experts, like the rest ot mankind, may tak® a given set of facts and draw absolutely divergent conclusions therefrom. It thus becomes necessary for some tribunal to make determination of the correctness of these opposite conclusions. That is the purpose of a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hartman v. Citizens Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Monroe v. Connecticut River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
  3. Portsmouth Gas Co. v. MaddoxOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Sheridan v. Gray's Ferry Abattoir Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  5. Consumers' Gas Trust Co. v. CorbaleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sternbock v. Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  2. State v. WhitmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Mayhorn v. PaveyOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Farber v. Houston CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  5. Jackson v. National Gas & Oil Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API