Legal Opinion

Butler v. City Council of Clinton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 19, 2003No. COA02-1268PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Tim and Francis Butler (“petitioners”) appeal from an order of the trial court affirming a denial by the City Council of the City of Clinton (“respondents”) of petitioners’ application for a conditional use permit (“CUP”) to operate a crematory in Clinton, North Carolina.

The facts pertinent to the instant appeal are as follows: On 8 January 2002, the City Council conducted a hearing on petitioners’ application. After reviewing the evidence, respondents determined that petitioners failed to present uncontroverted evidence that the proposed crematory would comply with all…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mann Media, Inc. v. Randolph County Planning BoardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Amanini v. N.C. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Sun Suites Holdings, LLC v. Board of AldermenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Baker v. Town of Rose HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Pisgah Oil Co. v. Western North Carolina Regional Air Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kay v. City of Rancho Palos VerdesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Kay v. Rancho Palos VerdesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API