Malautea v. Suzuki Motor Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FAY, Circuit Judge:
The defendants and their attorneys appeal sanctions imposed on them for grave and repeated abuses of the discovery process. In the district court, the defendants continually and willfully resisted discovery, even deliberately withholding discoverable information that the judge had ordered them to produce. As a result, the district judge, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2)(C), struck their answers and entered a default judgment against them on the issue of liability. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(g), he ordered the defendants and their attorneys held…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Avirgan v. HullCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- James P. Cotton, Jr. v. Massachusetts Mutual LifeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Peterson v. BMI RefractoriesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- St. Paul Reinsurance Co. v. Commercial Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
- Amlong & Amlong, PA v. Denny's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.