Legal Opinion

Saur v. Ferris

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the CircuitCourt of Cook County; the Hon. O. H. Horton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bailey

This was a bill in chancery, brought by Prudence B. Saur against Uriah B. Ferris, Bobert A. Brown and Charles H. Jackson, to enforce the specific performance of a contract, entered into by Brown, through Ferris as his agent, for the sale and conveyance to the complainant of a lot of land situate on the northeast corner of Seventy-eighth street and Bond avenue, Chicago. The defendants appeared and answered, and the cause being heard on pleadings and proofs, a decree was rendered dismissing the bill at the complainant’s costs for want of equity. To reverse that decree, the complainant has now…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. HazeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Doan, King & Co. v. MauzeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bell v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Giannini v. First National Bank of Des PlainesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Mack v. McIntoshIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Burke v. MierenfeldIllinois Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API