Legal Opinion

Barry v. Hughes

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 17, 1939No. 12PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The question is whether the defendants were plagiarists of the plaintiff, Barry’s, story. The theory is that Mackay saw it, and made it the basis of his play, which the defendants bought and used for one incident of their film. Several questions arise: (1) whether Mackay copied Barry’s story at all; (2) if he did, whether the defendants are chargeable with his use of it; (3) if Mackay copied it, and they followed him, whether they took more than Barry’s “idea”, as contrasted with its expression. It has been held that one who copies from a plagiarist is himself necessarily a plagiarist,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Press Ass'n v. Dairy Story Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1902

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., Inc. v. H. L. Green Company, Inc., and Third Party Jalen Amusement Company, Inc., and Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. De Acosta v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. v. Acadia CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  4. Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. v. Dan River Mills, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. Chappell & Co. v. CostaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API