Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1998No. COA97-432PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

When read together, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-926(a) and § 7A-49.3(a) permit a judge in a criminal trial to consolidate calendered charges with non-calendared charges that are based either on the same act or transaction, or on a series of acts or transactions connected together or constituting parts of a single scheme or plan. Because in this case, the non-calendered armed robbery charges are transactionally related to the calendered kidnaping charges, and the joining of those charges did not prejudice the defense, we affirm the trial court’s order consolidating those charges for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. BonneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. HuffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Spotted War Bonnet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FeathersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. RipleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. RipleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API