Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Burleson
Texas Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1853PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error. A motion was submitted in this case to dismiss the writ of error because the citation was not served on the defendant. The citation was served on the attorney of record; but there was no allegation that tlie defendant in error ivas a non-resident of the State, nor showing that ho could uot ho found.
1Opinion of the CourtLipscomb, J.
On the authority of James & Eastman v. The Heirs of Gray, 3 Tex. R., 514, the motion is sustained.
Writ of error dismissed.
Note 57. — Adkins v. Forehand, ante 270.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Mims v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Thomas v. ChildsTexas Supreme Court · 1872