Legal Opinion

Fox v. Village of Fleischmanns

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1942PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeyo, J.

The infant’s cause of action asserted both under the theory of negligence and of nuisance is for personal injuries suffered *455on a public skating rink maintained by the defendant village. William A. Fox, individually, joins as a party plaintiff, and asserts a cause of action for the medical expenses incurred in treating the infant and for the loss of his services. The answer, among other defenses, alleges that the individual plaintiff failed to file the notice required by section 341 of the Village Law within thirty days after the alleged, cause of action arosé. This motion is for a severance…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Psota v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  2. Winter v. . City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Thomann v. City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Gorlitzer v. . WolffbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Adonnino v. Village of Mount MorrisNew York Supreme Court · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. RoatNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Christian v. Village of HerkimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  3. Benedict v. Union Free School District No. 6New York Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Cavagnol v. Town of OrangetownNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Rudnicky v. KrayNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API