Legal Opinion

Adams v. Covenant Security Insurance Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1971No. 33921PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Commissioner.

Under what circumstances can it be said one automobile “replaces” another? The question arises under a public liability automobile insurance policy covering a specified automobile but extending coverage to a newly acquired automobile that “replaces” the specified automobile. Plaintiff contends this covered a new automobile used for the same purposes as the old automobile, even though the old one was still operable and had been retained by the insured solely for the purpose of sale. Conversely, the defendant contends the new automobile was not covered because the old…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greer v. Zurich Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Brugioni v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Winterton v. Van ZandtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  5. City of St. Louis v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. MacAlco, Inc. v. Gulf Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Hocker Oil Co. v. Barker-Phillips-Jackson, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Crawford v. Mid-America Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Stafford v. Travelers Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Crim v. National Life & Accident Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API