Legal Opinion

Beavin v. Com. Ex Rel. Whitworth, Com. Atty.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 16, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Cammack

Affirming modified judgment.

The appellant, Austin Beavin, is appealing from a judgment declaring the forfeiture of a lot owned by him in Cloverport on which are located two buildings. Tne forfeiture was directed under KBS 242.310. ■ This section reads as follows:

“(1) Any person knowingly or intentionally renting or permitting the use of, or using, any premises, or part thereof, or any vehicle for the purpose of unlawfully selling or transporting or possessing intoxicating liquors in dry territory, shall be guilty of a nuisance and of a violation of this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wolff v. Employers Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  2. Rickmam v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. Schneider v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  4. Froedge v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. PursleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  5. Moore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harlow v. DickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
  2. Witt v. LunsfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Williams v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
  4. Riddell v. Commonwealth ex rel. KashCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API