Legal Opinion
Beavin v. Com. Ex Rel. Whitworth, Com. Atty.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided November 16, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Cammack
Affirming modified judgment.
The appellant, Austin Beavin, is appealing from a judgment declaring the forfeiture of a lot owned by him in Cloverport on which are located two buildings. Tne forfeiture was directed under KBS 242.310. ■ This section reads as follows:
“(1) Any person knowingly or intentionally renting or permitting the use of, or using, any premises, or part thereof, or any vehicle for the purpose of unlawfully selling or transporting or possessing intoxicating liquors in dry territory, shall be guilty of a nuisance and of a violation of this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wolff v. Employers Fire Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Rickmam v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Schneider v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Froedge v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. PursleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Moore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
3Cited by4 opinions
- Harlow v. DickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
- Witt v. LunsfordCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
- Commonwealth ex rel. Williams v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1964
- Riddell v. Commonwealth ex rel. KashCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951