Rhoads v. Booth
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Henry District Court. A statement of the case is embodied in tbe opinion of tbe court.
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
Upon tbe information of defendant tbe plaintiffs in tbis action (three in number, but not partners), were arrested, tried before a justice of tbe peace for larceny, and after due examination were discharged. They thereupon instituted tbis action to recover damages for an alleged malicious prosecution. On tbe trial, defendant, among others, asked these instructions :
1st. Tbe damages in tbe case, if any, are purely personal, that is, they appertain to each person separately, and unless some co-interest or joint interest is shown, plaintiff cannot recover.
2d. If a man commit a trespass and kill…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Herstein v. KemkerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
- Hinkle v. DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- Brandirff v. Harrison CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- Graves v. Merchants & Bankers' InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Miller v. Hawkeye Gold Dredging Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.