Arizona Corp. Commission v. Continental Security Guards
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal by the Arizona Corporation Commission and two armored car service companies from a decision of the Superior Court of Maricopa County setting aside a finding by the Arizona Corporation Commission that the appellee, Continental Security Guards, Inc., must first obtain a certificate of convenience and necessity from the Arizona Corporation Commission before it may operate an armored car service in the State of Arizona.
We are called upon to determine whether the plaintiff, under the Constitution and statutes of the State of Arizona, is subject to regulation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Corporation Commission v. Pacific Greyhound LinesArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- General Alarm, Inc. v. UnderdownArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Cagle Bros. Trucking Service v. Arizona Corp. CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Killingsworth v. MorrowArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- Quick Aviation Co. v. KleinmanArizona Supreme Court · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Arizona Corp. Commission v. Continental Security GuardsArizona Supreme Court · 1968