Legal Opinion

Campana Corporation v. Glanzberg

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1935No. 7877PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is a suit in equity to restrain trademark infringement.

The trade-mark claimed was registered November 1, 1927, and consists of the words “Italian Balm.” The plaintiff’s second and third registrations are unimportant in this suit. The defendant originally used a label sufficiently like the plaintiff’s to be objectionable- as constituting unfair competition, but has discontinued it, and that phase of the case need not be considered. The defendant sells its product under the name of “Madame Duval’s Italian Balm,” and there is no evidence, apart from the use of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Manhattan Medicine Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Thaddeus Davids Co. v. Davids Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Scandinavia Belting Co. v. Asbestos & Rubber Works of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  4. Connell v. ReedMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  5. Julius Kayser & Co. v. Italian Silk Underwear Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Charles Hansen's Laboratory, Inc. v. KirkDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API