Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Sullivan County Electric Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Sullivan County

Decided June 12, 1922Published

1Opinion of the Court

Terry, P. J.,

— The plaintiffs have standing to question the defendant’s authority to interfere with their shade trees: Hannum v. Railway Co., 200 Pa. 44; Gring v. Sinking Spring Water Co., 270 Pa. 232.

The borough ordinances and its contract with Black, the deed from him to the defendant, the records before the Public Service Commission and its certificates, specified in our findings of facts, were admitted under objection, their effect to be determined in our disposition of the case. We now admit all of them in evidence, and their relevancy and weight will appear a little later in this…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania R. R. v. Montgomery County Passenger RailwaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Philadelphia Clay Co. v. York Clay Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  3. McDevitt v. People's Nat. Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Paul v. CarverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  5. Livingston v. Wolf, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1890

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API