Legal Opinion

Wentz v. Pennswood Apartments

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1986No. 834PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The principal issue in this appeal from a judgment entered on a defense verdict is whether the Pennsylvania “hills and ridges” doctrine applies to private walks which are covered with ice or snow, or only to public sidewalks. As a secondary issue, appellant requests that we review the trial court’s jury instructions pertaining to the choice of ways.

On January 16,1978, Terry Wentz, an employee of United Parcel Service, used a private walk to move from the street, where he had parked his truckrto the Pennswood Apartment Complex, Harrisburg, where he intended to deliver a package.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Carrender v. FittererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Atkins v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Rinaldi v. LevineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Tonik v. Apex Garages, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Morin v. Traveler's Rest Motel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Collins, D. v. Philadelphia Suburban DevelopmentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Finn v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. D. Moon v. Dauphin CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Giosa v. School District of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API