Wentz v. Pennswood Apartments
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
The principal issue in this appeal from a judgment entered on a defense verdict is whether the Pennsylvania “hills and ridges” doctrine applies to private walks which are covered with ice or snow, or only to public sidewalks. As a secondary issue, appellant requests that we review the trial court’s jury instructions pertaining to the choice of ways.
On January 16,1978, Terry Wentz, an employee of United Parcel Service, used a private walk to move from the street, where he had parked his truckrto the Pennswood Apartment Complex, Harrisburg, where he intended to deliver a package.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Carrender v. FittererSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Atkins v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Rinaldi v. LevineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Tonik v. Apex Garages, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Morin v. Traveler's Rest Motel, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Collins, D. v. Philadelphia Suburban DevelopmentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Finn v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- D. Moon v. Dauphin CountyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Giosa v. School District of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.