Legal Opinion
Griffin v. Next Composite Solutions, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided September 11, 2025No. 3:25-cv-00873Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DANIEL GRIFFIN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 25-cv-00873-JPG NEXT COMPOSITE SOLUTIONS, INC., and SCG, INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This case is before the Court on Plaintiff Daniel Griffin’s Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 22). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) governs amendments to pleadings. Rule 15(a)(1) allows amendment of a complaint once as a matter of course within 21 days after service of a response or a motion to dismiss, a motion for a more definite statement, or a motion to strike.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bausch v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Airborne Beepers & Video, Inc. v. AT & T Mobility LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Denise Sanders v. Venture Stores, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Carl Woods v. Indiana University-Purdue University at IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Orix Credit Alliance, Inc. v. Taylor MacHine Works, Inc., and William D. MettsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.