Blissard Management & Realty, Inc. v. Kremer
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John I. Purtle, Justice.
The trial court declared a mistrial when it apparently decided the verdict returned by the jury did not express their true intent. Both plaintiffs and defendant appeal, each arguing that the court should reform the verdict to conform with their own conclusions. We hold that under the circumstances of this case the trial court properly exercised its discretion in declaring a mistrial and placing the matter back on the trial docket.
Appellee sued the appellants and a third party as a result of injuries she received from a fall on allegedly unlighted common ground of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hazen v. City of BoonevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Underwood v. SledgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1871
- Massengale v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Stinson v. StinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
3Cited by13 opinions
- Young v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Travelodge International, Inc. v. Handleman National Book Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Kremer v. Blissard Management & Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Steward v. WurtzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Carter v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.