Charles Warkentien and Patricia Ann Warkentien v. James J. Vondracek and Donna L. Vondracek
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WISEMAN, District Judge.
The issue to be decided on this appeal is whether the trial court properly granted a judgment n. o. v. 1 for the defendants after a jury verdict finding the defendant-vendors liable to the plaintiff-vendees for the innocent misrepresentations of the defendants’ agent. The Court has thoroughly reviewed the record under the standards required in an appeal from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and we conclude that the lower court’s decision should be affirmed.
As stated by District Judge Miles in an excellent opinion that accompanied his order of a judgment n. o.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hi-Way Motor Co. v. International Harvester Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Johnson v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Caldwell v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Morelock v. NCR Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Philhall Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Manufacturing Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Meriwether v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- David ENGEBRETSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, Hartford Insurance Company, Intervening Plaintiff, v. FAIRCHILD AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Albert Toth v. The Yoder Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.