Legal Opinion

Meek v. Green

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 10, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, J.,

(after stating the facts). This court has held that, where a contract for the purchase and sale of land calls for an abstract showing good title, the covenant will be construed to mean a good record title, and not such a title as may be shown to be good by oral proof, or affidavits and other writings not subject to registration. In short, it is not sufficient in such cases that the title is good in-fact, that is, capable of being made good by the production of affidavits or other oral testimony, but it must be good of record. Hinton v. Martin, 151 Ark. 343; Dalton v. Lybarger, 152…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hinton v. MartinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  2. Bennett v. FaraboughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lucas v. MeekSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. Hillebrenner v. OdomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API