Legal Opinion

Thompson v. City of Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 2, 1983No. 2296-2301 and 2651-2659PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

In these appeals from an order granting a new trial solely on the issue of comparative negligence, the parties challenge this court’s jurisdiction, the mootness of the appeal, the lower court’s jury instructions, and the propriety of a grant of a new trial. We find that the appeal is properly before us, and that only the grant of a new trial was error. Accordingly, we reverse and enter judgment upon the jury’s verdict.

On September 28, 1976, William Smith, an employee of Srein Furniture Carriers [Srein], drove his tractor-trailer through a guardrail at the end of the Spring…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Mielcuszny Et Ux. v. Rosol (Et Ux.)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. FLICKINGER ESTATE v. RitskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Austin v. RidgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Bohner v. Eastern Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. McCay v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Corbett v. WeisbandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Burns v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Pachesky v. GetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Merritt v. City of ChesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API