Legal Opinion

Strickland v. Muir

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 17, 1965No. 5666PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Judge.

Each of the three plamtiffs-appellees moves to dismiss on the grounds (1) that the notice of appeal filed by the defendant-appellant allegedly fails to identify them by name and designation as required by Florida Appellate Rule 3.2(c), 31 F.S.A., and (2) that the defendant seeks review of three separate judgments by a single notice of appeal.

The plaintiffs, each having separate and distinct causes of action for fraud, among others, against the defendant-appellant, brought two separate actions in the court below. The defendant did not object to the joinder of two of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Orange Belt Packing Co. v. International Agricultural Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Stewart v. CodringtonSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. Vander Car v. PittsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  4. Borland v. South Patrick Utility Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  5. North American Co. v. LandahlDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hollimon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. Holliman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API