Legal Opinion

City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Power & Light Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1934Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

The city sued to recover $9,389.95, an apportionment of the cost of paving Euclid avenue in improvement district No. 126, and $2,602.74, an apportionment of the cost of paving University avenue in improvement district No. 116, and for paving a street in improvement district No. 30. The complainant insisted that the street railway was chargeable with the cost of paving between the tracks and a foot on both sides, under the common law, as well as under the Knoxville Local Improvement Law, chapter 348, Private Acts of 1925. The chancellor held that the duty was not imposed by the common law, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chicago v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. Wisconsin Ex Rel. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Western Paving & Supply Co. v. Citizens' Street RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. State ex rel. Worrell v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. O'Reilley v. . City of KingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API