Legal Opinion

Succession of Hillebrandt

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 15, 1869No. 1463PublishedCited by 4 opinions

» PPEAL from Second District Court of New Orleans. Thomas, J.

1Opinion of the CourtWylt, J.

The executor of the succession of Hillebrandt filed his account, which was opposed by J. Kohn, the executor of the succession of Samuel Kohn, because the claim of the latter, to wit, a mortgage note for $6500, due twenty-sixth day of January, 1857, was not placed on the tableau.

On the trial the executor of the succession of Hillebrandt set up various defenses against the note in favor of Samuel Kohn. The most serious one seems to be the prescription of five years, which we propose to consider first.

*351Tlie note on its face is evidently prescribed. Numerous credits, extending from fourth…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coreil v. VidrineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  2. Succession of DriscollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
  3. Robin v. WalshLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Reed v. Succession of GibsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API