Legal Opinion

McDonough v. Pinsley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 1, 1997PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered July 17, 1996, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant’s motion to compel production of a document used by plaintiff to refresh his recollection at his deposition, and certain of plaintiff’s income tax returns, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, to compel production of the document used at the deposition, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

Any privilege protecting the subject document from disclosure was waived by plaintiff when he used it to refresh his recollection (Grieco v Cunningham, 128 AD2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haenel v. NovemberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Grieco v. CunninghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. LahiriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Serrano v. RajamaniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Chaya S. v. Herbert L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API