Legal Opinion

Flax v. City of Richmond

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 7, 1949No. Record No. 3453PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

This writ of error brings before us for review a judgment of the Hustings Court of the city of Richmond denying the application of Herbert Flax for issuance of an order and certificate authorizing and allowing him to be licensed as a pawnbroker. He will be called the petitioner, in accordance with his position in the lower court, and the city of Richmond will be referred to as defendant.

Section 191 of the Tax Code of Virginia defines a pawnbroker and, among other things, prescribes the qualifications required of an applicant for a State license and the conditions under which it may be issued.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. County Board of Supervisors v. American Trailer Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  2. Hercules Powder Company v. Continental Can Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1955
  3. County of Loudoun v. ParkerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API