Legal Opinion

State v. GAD

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 12, 2010No. 2D09-2039PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

The State challenges the trial court’s order granting Mahmoud Gad’s motion in limine and excluding as evidence three statements made by Mr. Gad. Because the trial court abused its discretion in granting the motion, we reverse.

The State charged Mr. Gad with attempted sexual battery and battery. The depositions taken in anticipation of trial reflect that, on the night in question, Mr. Gad and the victim had gone out for drinks, leaving Mr. Gad’s wife at home. The victim alleged that upon their return home but prior to their entering the residence, Mr. Gad pulled her over to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steverson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. State v. AndresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. State v. AylesworthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. State v. BlackwellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Emilia L. Carr v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  2. FRANK ALBERT MARTINEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. State v. WrightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  4. Emilia L. Carr v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2015
  5. MARQUIS VALENTINE v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API