Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Stanford

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 12, 1990No. 89-7496Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

KATZ, District Judge.

This is an action for declaratory judgment brought by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) for the purpose of determining the amount of underinsured motorist coverage available to the defendants under two policies of automobile insurance issued by State Farm. Each of these policies contains an arbitration clause. Defendants have moved to dismiss plaintiffs complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) on the ground that the issue of the amount of underinsured motorist coverage is within the exclusive…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Emmaus Municipal Authority v. EltzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Myers, Kevin v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Pennsylvania General Insurance v. BarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Arthur J. Lacourse, on Behalf of the Estate of Peter Lacourse, Deceased v. Firemen's Insurance Company of Newark, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Allstate Insurance Company v. Michael B. GammonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API