Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barry v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 9, 1957No. 28588Published

1DissentDavidson, Judge

Venireman Broadnax, a Negro, was duly drawn as a member of the venire from which the jury in this case was to be selected. He was, in all things, qualified under the Constitution and laws of this state for jury service. He was not shown to be disqualified to serve on the jury in this case.

Over appellant’s objection and at the request of the state, the trial court dismissed Broadnax from the venire list and from jury service because he was a member of the Negro race and because of the absence of facilities to house and feed a jury composed of members of both the white and Negro races.

In Rogers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Winfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955
  2. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API