Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Transportes Maritimos Do Estado

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 15, 1924No. 26PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

By this original petition the duly accredited Minister of the Republic of Portugal asks for the writ of prohibition or mandamus to prevent further action in the proceeding instituted by Stephen Ransom Dry Dock & Repair Corporation in the District Court at New York, April 14, 1921, to enforce payment for services and materials furnished the Sao Vicente. Recognizing the high consideration always due diplomatic representatives of friendly nations, we entertained the petition and directed a rule to show cause why relief should not be granted. The return is here and, after hearing oral argument,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. The PesaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Ex Parte Hussein Lutfi BeySupreme Court of the United States · 1921

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. The S. S. SamovarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1947
  2. Ex Parte Transportes MaritimosSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Transportes Maritimos Do Estado v. AlmeidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API