Legal Opinion

Duke Investments, Ltd. v. Amegy Bank, N.A. (In Re Duke Investments, Ltd.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

Decided June 17, 2011No. 19-30049PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED EMERGENCY MOTION TO DISQUALIFY KENNETH STOHNER, JR. AND JACKSON WALKER, LLP [Adv. Docket No. 56]

JEFF BOHM, Bankruptcy Judge.

I. Introduction

The Court writes this Memorandum Opinion because it underscores the problems that can arise when an attorney signs a proof of claim on behalf of the client.

Duke Investments, Ltd. and Mark Duke (the Plaintiffs) filed a motion requesting this Court to disqualify both the Jackson Walker law firm (Jackson Walker) and Kenneth Stohner (Stohner), a partner at Jackson Walker, from representing Amegy Bank, N.A., defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Southmark Corp. v. Coopers & LybrandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. In Re American Airlines, Inc., Amr CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. Spears v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re SandersTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McNeil v. SullivanDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2020
  2. Royal Alice Properties, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API