Legal Opinion

In Re Acron

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 16, 2004No. 52877-7-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

95 P.3d 1272 (2004)

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint Petition Of Michael ACRON, Petitioner.

No. 52877-7-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

August 16, 2004.

Eric Nielson, Nielsen Broman & Koch, Seattle, WA for Appellant.

Seth Aaron Fine, Snohomish Co. Prosecuting Attorney, Everett, WA, for Respondent.

ELLINGTON, A.C.J.

Felonies for which the legislature has assigned no seriousness level ranking have a standard sentencing range of 0 to 12 months. Michael Acron was convicted of an unranked offense. His sentence was based upon the seriousness level established for another crime. We…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. State v. WatsonWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of HopkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SotoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Goldsmith v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Anita Khandelwal v. Seattle Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. In Re BradyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. In re the Personal Restraint of BradyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API