Rogers v. Ingersoll
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Robert H. Ingersoll and another, from a judgment of the Supreme' Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 9th day of December, 1903, upon the report of a referee, with notice of an intention to bring up for review upon such appeal an intermediate order entered in said clerk’s office on the 30th day of September, 1901, substituting John Z. Rogers as plaintiff, and also an order entered in…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the defendants, Robert H. Ingersoll and another, from a judgment of the Supreme' Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 9th day of December, 1903, upon the report of a referee, with notice of an intention to bring up for review upon such appeal an intermediate order entered in said clerk’s office on the 30th day of September, 1901, substituting John Z. Rogers as plaintiff, and also an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 17th day of July, 1900, referring said action to a referee.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
This action was tried before a referee. A large part of the record is taken up by objections taken and the arguments thereon by the defendants’ counsel, most of which are absolutely frivolous, repeated again and again, and now insisted on; the appellants’ brief stating, “ Therefore, the appellants note the fact here that every objection in the case is good ground for reversal.” It would be a waste of time to discuss most of these objections, and all that I shall attempt to do is to point out what appears to be the real questions in the case.
The action was originally brought by…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cronin v. . CrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Stone v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1895
- King v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Ross v. IngersollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
3Cited by1 opinion
- Breakstone Bros. Bronx Branch, Inc. v. HymanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916