Appleton Manufacturing Co. v. Fox River Paper Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie county: John Goodland, Circuit Judge. to the point that the counterclaim should have been sustained, cited Lombard v. Cowham, 34 Wis. 486; Prentiss v. Brewer, 17 Wis. 638, 643; Du Pont v. Davis, 35 Wis. 631, 639, 641; McPherson v. Featherstone, 37 Wis. 632, 644; Brown v. OoJm, 88 Wis. 627, 634; Weld v.. Johnson, 86 Wis. 552; Lomev.
Read the full summary
Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Outagamie county: John Goodland, Circuit Judge. to the point that the counterclaim should have been sustained, cited Lombard v. Cowham, 34 Wis. 486; Prentiss v. Brewer, 17 Wis. 638, 643; Du Pont v. Davis, 35 Wis. 631, 639, 641; McPherson v. Featherstone, 37 Wis. 632, 644; Brown v. OoJm, 88 Wis. 627, 634; Weld v.. Johnson, 86 Wis. 552; Lomev. Hyde, 39 Wis. 345, 354, and cases cited; Moore v. Smead, 89 Wis. 558, 569; Dobbs v. Kellogg, 53 Wis. 448, 451; Stqwell v. Fldred, 39 Wis. 614, 630; Dietrich v. Koch, 35 Wis. 618, 626, and cases cited.
1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, C. J.
This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the counterclaim set out in the answer. The action is ejectment to recover a strip of land twelve feet wide and 406 feet long in the bed of Fox Eiver, upon which is built the spill way and wing dam, as therein specifically described; and the complaint is in the statutory form, and alleges that the plaintiff is the owner, in fee of such premises. Sec. 3077, Stats. 1898.
The answer by way of defense alleges, in effect, that the premises are a part of a larger tract of land,described; that on and prior to January 15, 1850, said lands were…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Kirk v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Lawe v. HydeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Dietrich v. KochWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Moore v. SmeadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. McKeigueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Harley v. HarleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Stolze v. TorrisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Kipp v. GatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
- Guaranteed Investment Co. v. St. Croix Consolidated Copper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.