Legal Opinion

Drouillard v. Labadie

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1929No. Docket No. 123, Calendar No. 34,643PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

In May, 1922, plaintiff filed a bill of complaint in the Wayne circuit against defendant Charles A. Labadie alleging that he owned, which was the fact, a part of private plaim 179, lying between Monroe road and Detroit river, sufficiently described, and that defendant, owner of a parcel adjoining on the north, had entered upon the land and was erecting a fence’ four-feet south of plaintiff’s north line on the assertion and claim that the proposed fence marked the true line. The bill prayed injunction, and decree that plaintiff was the owner of the disputed strip. Plaintiff’s claim was set…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palmer v. PokornyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Tessler v. RothmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Knoth v. A. Harvey's Sons Manfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Hogan v. WhitcombMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Theisen v. City of DearbornMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Forbes v. ZiegenhardtMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Theisen v. City of DearbornMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API