Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. State ex rel. Londrosh

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the district court for Thurston county. Tried below before Norris, J. Olive v. State, 11 Neb., 1; art. 1, Const. Neb., sec. 6; Sprick v. Washington Co., 3 Neb., 255 ; Crossley v. Steele, 13 Id., 221; Bansdell v. Beed, 15 Id., 644; Paries v. Poss, 11 How. [U. S.], 362 and cases; Ins. Co. v. Tweed, 7 Wall. [U. S.], 44; Anderson v. Colson, 1 Neb., 173; State v. Palmer, 10 Id., 207; 2 Dillon, Mun.

Read the full summary

Error to the district court for Thurston county. Tried below before Norris, J. Olive v. State, 11 Neb., 1; art. 1, Const. Neb., sec. 6; Sprick v. Washington Co., 3 Neb., 255 ; Crossley v. Steele, 13 Id., 221; Bansdell v. Beed, 15 Id., 644; Paries v. Poss, 11 How. [U. S.], 362 and cases; Ins. Co. v. Tweed, 7 Wall. [U. S.], 44; Anderson v. Colson, 1 Neb., 173; State v. Palmer, 10 Id., 207; 2 Dillon, Mun. Corp., secs. 827, 828, 829, 832, 833, 864; Angelí & Ames, Corp., 709; Mitchell v. Sch. hist., 8 Neb., 92; Beatty v. Omaha, 14 Id., 267 ; Tingley v. Dolby, 13 Id., 374; Dobbins v. Oberman, 17…

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

In April, 1890, the relator applied to Judge Norris for a peremptory writ of mandamus against the plaintiffs in error, whereupon said judge granted an alternative writ as follows: “Whereas it has been suggested to the undersigned judge of the seventh judicial district of the state of Nebraska, by the affidavit of Ashley Londrosh, the relator herein, that Thurston county, in the state of Nebraska, was duly organized by an act of the legislature of the state of Nebraska, said act approved March 26, A. I). 1889, and that certain persons were appointed by the governor of the state of Nebraska…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Nichols v. FieldNebraska Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hodgin v. WhitcombNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API