Legal Opinion
CRP/Extell Parcel I, L.P. v. Cuomo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 11, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Attorney General’s determinations were not affected by an error of law or arbitrary and capricious (CPLR 7803 [3]; see Matter of Madison Park Owner LLC v Schneiderman, 93 AD3d 555, 556 [1st Dept 2012]). Indeed, the Attorney General properly applied the common law in denying petitioner’s claim for contract reformation based on an alleged scrivener’s error (see *474e.g. Stonebridge Capital, LLC v Nomura Intl. PLC, 68 AD3d 546, 548 [1st Dept 2009], lv dismissed 15 NY3d 735 [2010]).
The court properly denied discovery in connection with the CPLR article 78 proceeding, as the material petitioner…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Levine v. Board of EstimateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sapphire Investment Ventures, LLC v. Mark Hotel Sponsor LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Bevilacqua v. CRP/Extell Parcel I, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Coffey v. CRP/Extell Parcel I, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Coffey v. CRP/Extell Parcel I, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014