Cratin v. Cratin

ON SUGGESTION OF ERROR.

The appellant suggests that we failed, in our former decision herein, to decide one question presented by the record. This is true, but our failure so to do was not altogether our fault.

But that aside, the question is one that will confront the court below on a return of the case thereto, and should be decided. The question is the sufficiency, vel non, of a plea filed after the overruling of the demurrer to the appellee's petition. This plea alleged, in substance, that the appellee had, for more than thirty years, known of the existence of this decree of divorce, but…