Legal Opinion

James McDaniel v. W. Stachowski, John Doe, Jane Doe, Frank E. Smith, Anthony Dasilva, Gary D. Kresser, Kay Baase, and Kevin McNiff

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 13, 1996No. 95-2539Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

104 F.3d 349

NOTICE: THIS SUMMARY ORDER MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. SEE SECOND CIRCUIT RULE 0.23.

James McDANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

W. STACHOWSKI, John Doe, Jane Doe, Frank E. Smith, Anthony

Dasilva, Gary D. Kresser, Kay Baase, and Kevin

McNiff, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-2539.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Sept. 13, 1996.

1

James McDaniel, pro se.

2

Dennis C. Vacco, N.Y. Att'y Gen., Albany, NY.

3

P…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Littles v. Board of Pardons & Paroles DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Warley v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Froats v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API