Leo Feist, Inc. v. Song Parodies, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
These are actions in which jurisdiction is based solely on the federal copyright statute, for there is lack of diversity of citizenship. The District Court held that defendants had flagrantly infringed the plaintiffs’ copyrights of certain *401songs. The evidence fully supports that court’s findings of fact which in turn justify its legal conclusions, unless there is merit to defendants’ contention that an earlier suit brought by plaintiffs against defendants in the New York Supreme Court, for unfair competition in connection with the sale of the very songs involved in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- The Evergreens v. NunanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Reeves v. BeardallSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Condon v. Associated Hospital ServiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Collins v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- MCA, Inc. v. WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Berlin v. E. C. Publications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Leo Feist, Inc. v. Song Parodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944