Chamblin v. K-Mart Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mikell, Judge.
Jimmy and Jan Chamblin filed the underlying action against K-Mart Corporation (“K-Mart”) after Jan Chamblin had an extreme allergic reaction to a prescription filled at a K-Mart pharmacy. Jan Chamblin alleged that the pharmacist failed to warn her of the potential side effects of the drug in violation of the appropriate standard of care. The trial court granted summary judgment to K-Mart based on its conclusion that the “learned intermediary” doctrine barred any recovery against the pharmacy. The trial court denied the Chamblins’ motion for partial summary judgment on the issue…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Bradley Center, Inc. v. WessnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Walker v. Jack Eckerd Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Eldridge v. Eli Lilly & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Fakhouri v. TaylorAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Quick Rx Drugs, Inc. v. Bryant RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
- Nail v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
- Quick Rx Drugs, Inc. v. Bryant RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017