Boles v. BARTRUFF
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge ROMAN.
In this C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) action, plaintiff, Russell M. Boles, appeals the trial court's judgment affirming a prison disciplinary conviction. He asserts that he was denied due process at his disciplinary hearing, that the evidence supporting his conviction was insufficient, that the search of his cell was invalid, and that he was not provided discovery. We affirm.
I. Background
Plaintiff is an inmate in the custody of the Colorado Department of Corrections (DOC). Based on the discovery of two prescription pills in a dental floss container on a shelf in his assigned…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Onofre T. Serrano v. S.W. FrancisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boles v. BARTRUFFColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Farrow v. CDOCColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
- Ruffin v. CDOCColorado Court of Appeals · 2024