Legal Opinion

Hall v. Roehr & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 23, 1913No. 4806PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Trover; from city court of Bainbridge — Judge Spooner. March 7, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

“Where the only questions presented for review by this court arise upon rulings by'the court below on the trial of the issue raised by a special plea to the jurisdiction, which was not sustained by the verdict thereon returned, and it appears that neither a reversal of any one or more of such rulings nor a setting aside of §uch verdict would operate to terminate the main ease, but would leave the same still pending, the writ of error is premature and must be dismissed.” Ross v. Mercer, 115 Ga. 353 (41 S. E. 594). See also, State Mutual Association v. Kemp, 115 Ga. 355 (41 S. E. 652); Warren…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ross v. MercerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. State Mutual Life & Annuity Ass'n v. KempSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Warren v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Porter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. Mutual Fertilizer Company v. DeloachCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  3. Mutual Fertilizer Company v. DeloachCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API