Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Brush & Mop Mfg Co. v. Weber

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1929No. 3513PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

Section 8129 GC, provides that every negotiable instrument is deemed prima facie to have been issued for a valuable consideration. Section 8130 GC, provides that value is any consideration sufficient to support a simple contract. There was no evidence introduced by the defendant to meet the presumption of value or any evidence indicating that value, within the meaning of 8130 GC did not exist, but, on the contrary, the evidence showed a promise to perform the work by the payee of the note which promise could be and was the supporting consideration for the note.

There was some question raised…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Bank of Marianna v. Havana Canning Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
  2. Lambright v. HeckOhio Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API