Legal Opinion
Rose v. Johnson
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided March 26, 2001No. CIV. A. H-99-2535PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CRONE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
Petitioner Nathan Lynn Rose (“Rose”) challenges his 1995 conviction for aggravated robbery and forty-year sentence of imprisonment. Having reviewed the pending motion, the submissions of the parties, the state court record, and the applicable law, the court is of the opinion that Respondent Gary L. Johnson’s (“Johnson”) Motion for Summary Judgment (# 13) should be granted, Rose’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (# 4) and Motion for Summary Judgment (# 14) should be denied, and a certificate of ap-pealability…
2Cases cited327 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
322 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rose v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2001