Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 26, 1895No. 799PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Coke. Tried below before Hon. D. T. Averitt. This is an appeal from a conviction of playing cards in an outhouse, the punishment being assessed at a fine of $17.50. Ho statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of gaining in an outhouse where people resort. This a companion case to Moore v. The State, 31 S. W. Rep., 649. No exceptions were reserved in the case, however, to the introduction of testimony, or to any other ruling of the court. Under the ruling in Wheelock’s cases, 15 Texas, 257-260, this case is clearly made out. On more than one occasion card playing occurred in said house. “ Frequently, last winter, I saw men who. were stopping here in town resorting to this house, testified one of the witnesses. It was an outhouse, and the room where the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wheelock v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Shippy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  3. Banks Stocks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Cabrera v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Hankins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API