Legal Opinion

Morrell v. New York State Racing & Wagering Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 11, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the respondent’s determination is supported by substantial evidence in the record (see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit (cf., Matter of LaChance v Corbisiero, 160 AD2d 293). Thompson, J. P., Joy, Hart and Plorio, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. LaChance v. CorbisieroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990